Judgment note · Education desk

Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2019)

15 June 2019 · Judgments · Landmark judgments · Supreme Court

View PDF Download PDF

Educational desk note PDF from advadeshkumar.com — not the official court certified copy. Confirm the operative order on the court website.

Desk readingBrowser voice · educational note · not a recording

Court: Supreme Court of India · Date: 10 January 2020 · Citation: (2020) 3 SCC 637

Case

Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India

Facts

Challenges to movement and internet restrictions in J&K after constitutional changes; press and business impacts were pleaded.

Legal issues

What limits apply to internet shutdowns and speech/press restrictions?

Law / provisions

Articles 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g); Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services Rules; proportionality.

Holding

Freedom of speech and expression online is protected; indefinite shutdowns are impermissible; orders must meet proportionality, and restriction orders should be published / available for challenge.

Key takeaways

  • Internet access is integral to modern speech and trade — restrictions need law + proportionality.
  • Secret / unpublished restriction orders undermine review.
  • Still the lead cite for shutdown litigation.

Significance

Leading authority on internet shutdowns and online speech.

Primary source

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/82303471/

Verify the operative paragraphs on the court / reportable text. Indian Kanoon and similar mirrors are research aids, not certified copies.

Education desk note — Advocate Adesh Kumar — advadeshkumar.com
Educational content only. Not legal advice. Not solicitation. Not an official certified copy.