Court: Supreme Court of India · Date: 10 January 2020 · Citation: (2020) 3 SCC 637
Case
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India
Facts
Challenges to movement and internet restrictions in J&K after constitutional changes; press and business impacts were pleaded.
Legal issues
What limits apply to internet shutdowns and speech/press restrictions?
Law / provisions
Articles 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g); Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services Rules; proportionality.
Holding
Freedom of speech and expression online is protected; indefinite shutdowns are impermissible; orders must meet proportionality, and restriction orders should be published / available for challenge.
Key takeaways
- Internet access is integral to modern speech and trade — restrictions need law + proportionality.
- Secret / unpublished restriction orders undermine review.
- Still the lead cite for shutdown litigation.
Significance
Leading authority on internet shutdowns and online speech.
Primary source
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/82303471/
Verify the operative paragraphs on the court / reportable text. Indian Kanoon and similar mirrors are research aids, not certified copies.
Education desk note — Advocate Adesh Kumar — advadeshkumar.com
Educational content only. Not legal advice. Not solicitation. Not an official certified copy.
