Judgment note · Education desk

S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)

15 June 1994 · Judgments · Landmark judgments · Supreme Court

View PDF Download PDF

Educational desk note PDF from advadeshkumar.com — not the official court certified copy. Confirm the operative order on the court website.

Desk readingBrowser voice · educational note · not a recording

Court: Supreme Court of India · Date: 11 March 1994 · Citation: (1994) 3 SCC 1

Case

S.R. Bommai v. Union of India

Facts

Challenges to dismissals of State governments under Article 356.

Legal issues

Judicial review of Article 356 proclamations dismissing State governments.

Law / provisions

Article 356; federalism; secularism as basic features.

Holding

President’s satisfaction under Article 356 is justiciable on limited grounds; floor test preferred to assess majority; federalism and secularism inform the basic-structure limits on misuse of 356.

Key takeaways

  • Article 356 is not a political blank cheque.
  • Floor test over speculative majority claims.
  • Federalism / secularism constrain Centre–State coercion.

Significance

Definitive federalism case on President’s Rule.

Primary source

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/999195/

Verify the operative paragraphs on the court / reportable text. Indian Kanoon and similar mirrors are research aids, not certified copies.

Education desk note — Advocate Adesh Kumar — advadeshkumar.com
Educational content only. Not legal advice. Not solicitation. Not an official certified copy.