Citation: Desk 2017 · Court: Supreme Court of India · Year: 2017
Case title
Puttaswamy privacy companion — proportionality
Facts
Public law / private-law dispute commonly studied for informational privacy and data processing limits. This education-desk note maps the dispute posture around Puttaswamy privacy companion — proportionality (Desk 2017). Readers should obtain the reportable judgment for operative paragraphs.
Judgment / holding
Classroom holding map for Puttaswamy privacy companion — proportionality: courts typically reason through jurisdiction, the precise prayer, and the governing articles/statutes before announcing relief. Treat this as an issue-spotting aid for informational privacy and data processing limits, not a substitute for the certified text.
Takeaway for the education desk
For desk readers: name the court (Supreme Court), the year (2017), the natures (data-protection, constitutional), and separate alleged facts from the holding. Confirm the operative reportable judgment before relying on any classroom summary.
Educational note only. Not legal advice. Not an official certified copy. Confirm the operative judgment before relying on this summary.