Citation: AIR 1967 SC 1643 · Court: Supreme Court of India · Year: 1967
Case title
I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab
Facts
Land reform / rights amendments were attacked as destroying fundamental rights.
Judgment / holding
Held (prospectively) that Parliament could not amend fundamental rights — reversed in substance by Kesavananda’s basic structure doctrine.
Takeaway for the education desk
For desk readers: name the court (Supreme Court), the year (1967), the natures (constitutional, property), and separate alleged facts from the holding. Confirm the operative reportable judgment before relying on any classroom summary.
Educational note only. Not legal advice. Not an official certified copy. Confirm the operative judgment before relying on this summary.